Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD NASIR HUSSAIN versus PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

Section 7 (3) / 5 (1) (a) (b) Constitution of Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act, 1952 (1973) Article 199 Government scholarship for higher education to abolish the process of receiving constitutional application. Was awarded. With the consent of his employer, he went abroad with the condition that he would rejoin the service after completing his education, the case against the accused was that he harmed the defendant against the scholarship money given to him. Was. The assurance that he would return after being charged was to benefit from the scholarship, which was extended one year to 4 years and another 60 months, which means that his services will be available for the entire period. Was not, therefore, urgently required for the institution, otherwise it would not be allowed to voluntarily go abroad provided the provisions of the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act 1952, were strictly punished. Were forced to study in harmony and in harmony with each other. Had violated his contract by staying, though according to which he was not asked to join the duties, his case was, therefore, one of civil liability and under the criminal provisions of the Pakistan Essential Services Act 1952. It was not covered, even if it had been extended, however, pending proceedings against the accused under the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act 1952, the circumstances in the court magistrate were abolished. Accordingly, the controversial application was accepted immigration advocates phone number from Gilgit lawyer