SOHRAB versus THE STATE
Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Evidence Definition Section 103, CRPC conviction provisions did not apply to the case in which police officers He did not corrupt the prosecution's witnesses or rebel against the accused and their evidence could not be excluded solely on the basis of their police personnel. And the heroin was recovered from the suspect. Immediately after the chemical analyst reported his arrest for the said drugs, the police officer was not banned according to the complaint if he was a witness to the commission of the crime and could also become an investigating officer. No prejudice in any way. The adjudicated verdict did not face any unlawful interference or material misconduct, under which the defendant's conviction was upheld; b. In view of this, his sentence of ten years imprisonment \ RI was reduced to six years \ RI
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer
