Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SOHRAB versus THE STATE


Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Evidence Definition Section 103, CRPC conviction provisions did not apply to the case in which police officers He did not corrupt the prosecution's witnesses or rebel against the accused and their evidence could not be excluded solely on the basis of their police personnel. And the heroin was recovered from the suspect. Immediately after the chemical analyst reported his arrest for the said drugs, the police officer was not banned according to the complaint if he was a witness to the commission of the crime and could also become an investigating officer. No prejudice in any way. The adjudicated verdict did not face any unlawful interference or material misconduct, under which the defendant's conviction was upheld; b. In view of this, his sentence of ten years imprisonment \ RI was reduced to six years \ RI

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.