MST. IFTIKHARUN NISA versus MST. RAZIA BEGUM
The appellate court's jurisdiction to decide the application for modification of the suit filed by the plaintiffs, section 115 and O VI, R 17 of the Code of Conduct, was dismissed by the plaintiff's appellate court, trial and appeal. During the hearing before the Court of Appeal, without the decision of the plaintiffs to petition for modification of the plaintiff, the appellate court dismissed the appeal verdict by the appellate court to decide the appeal in one way or another. Had subjected the plaintiff's rights to material discrimination and disappointment. After seizing the request for justice, the appellate court should have settled the matter before proceeding further, the purpose of the judicial function was to reach the truth and do justice to the parties, the decision and decision by the appellate court. Was isolated. Appellate court was remanded for its fresh verdict in this case after dismissing the appeal citation for amending the waiver
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sialkot lawyer