Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE SAIGAL versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OFPAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF MANAGER

Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan Ordinance 1961 Section 39 Application for Bank Claim Enforcement App 2 Due to the absence of the appellant lenders in 1995, when arguments were heard on their miscellaneous application, the court against them Without forehead, hearing. The miscellaneous application, too, decided and allowed the bank's main request was not clear from the court order sheet below whether the date of 7 2 1995 was also fixed for the hearing of the central petition, but it also showed that The only miscellaneous application was made on this date if the appellant's counsel was not present on that day, only his miscellaneous application should have been dismissed and the defendant's central request under section 39 of the Ordinance Should have been scheduled for a hearing. The material irregularity as it did not hear the appeals on the central petition The High Court obtained the remand by setting aside the defamatory order. Applied to the court below. immigration advocates email from Washuk lawyer