Find a Lawyer

SANA ULLAH versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 420, 419/34, 468/34, 471/34, 161/34 and 165/34 Definition of Evidence The accused was an advocate who participated in the examination by his senior advocate (bad accused partner). A case was filed against the accused and their acquittals were acquitted. They have been proved by the neutral and natural statements of the prosecution witnesses, whatever prejudice they were accused of. Having been with the witnesses for quite some time, no identification was required. His identity in this case and in the court was sufficient to identify the fact that the application form for the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge (for which the accused appeared in the imitation of his senior) was photocopied and capable of proof. The confession was not to be pressed into the job to set aside the conviction that the entire game was being played by the co-accused actually being released and the accused was just a valid in his purse DS's logical end. The High Court's additional registrars and deputies were independent and impartial witnesses to testify to their logical end. His credibility was beyond any doubt that the acquiring co-accused also tried to bargain with the prosecutor's witness motive with the accompanying accomplice, was it that if he succeeded in his plan, His counsel also denied the fact that he was also appointed to the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Criminal Zamir, of the two accused. Accept the offer to send the signature of the Additional Advocate General's offer to the High Court advocate for immigration from Ghotki lawyer