Find a Lawyer

DILBEER HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

The unmarried prosecutors testified against all the defendants at the time of the hearing, appreciating the evidence of section 10 (4) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), and nothing was brought to the record to show that Why incorrectly add The photographs taken by the accused at the time of the incident show that the victim was subjected to force and was delayed in recording the prosecution's statement under Section 161, according to police, I had lost my importance. The filing of the FLR also clarified that even though the parties were not inconsistent with each other, such delay had no significant impact on the case, the prosecution version had the help of medical evidence, the defense The evidence was not worth any credit There was no enmity with the prosecution's witnesses The conviction of the accused for falsely involving them in such a serious nature was maintained in cases where the prosecutor was not innocent. Who entered the marriage immediately after the registration of the case and after a long time reported the matter to the police Was given to the accused by the court under section 10 (4) of adultery. According to the (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, each was sentenced to life imprisonment. top advocates from Shikarpur lawyer