RANA SHAHBAZ AHMED versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (4), oral testimony was a natural, credible, satisfying and inspiring statement of confidence, with the other three faces falling under. Witnesses also supported it. As well as the house where the crime was committed, Chandar obtained protection from the Investigation Officer, who was found to have seized blood and blood by a chemical executor, accusing the prosecution's witness of any rivalry, unlawful desire or misconduct. Was not taken by the defense. Due to their brutal act, the allegations were mis-read or unread without evidence being properly analyzed, evaluated and examined and did not deserve any relaxation. The accused's appeal was dismissed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Haripur lawyer
