Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SABIR KHAN versus RAHIM BAKHSH

Sections 42 and 54 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), Sections 151, O XXI, R 32 and O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3 Transfer Property Act (I82 of 1882), Section 52 Declaration and Case for Permanent Order Prohibited Sale, which the defendants did in violation of a prohibited order passed during sanctions and then permanently barring them from separating the shares of other partners. Argued that the injunction would be a breach of order / injunction, not just affirmative action, but would not adversely affect such sales. Cannot be connected to any proceedings in the form of a legal justification and against a court order. A law punishing under the law would be an illegal act and it cannot be said. It is permissible that all sales made during this pendency and in violation of a court order / injunction were inappropriate for all intents and purposes, and if such presence is permitted, it shall Approval of illegal proceedings would be equivalent to violating a court order, so in addition to initiating proceedings under Section 3 of the contempt of court act, 1976, the court shall be liable to O XXI, R 32 and O XXXIX, R 2 (3), may proceed under CPC. The decree may exercise its powers under section 151 to prevent misconduct, and corrective measures can be taken to uphold and uphold the greatness of the law against wrongdoers. best advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer