Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF KASHMIR AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN AREAS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 2 (1) (b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Service Tribunal scope for employees of Northern Territories Section 4 employees of Northern Territory were employees of the Northern Territory and were satisfied with the seniority. Were not Prior to the service tribunal's appeal, the service tribunal's appeal was dismissed because the appellant was not a public servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of the service tribunal to govern civil rights of citizens generally by law Cannot order. The judicial forum for its implementation was a completely different matter and there was no unity as a person to seek the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal in the service of the Northern Territory for Section 2 (l). (B), as defined in Section 4 of the Civil Tribunal Act, 1973, may be exempt from the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal. As an employee of the Northern Territory Administration, the federal government did not have a federal government to enforce the terms and conditions of its services against the original or appeal order of the departmental authority of the appellant because he (the federal government) was not employed by it. ? The Northern Territory Administration was not a federal government employee, its terms and conditions were governed by the Northern Territory's rules and regulations. The Supreme Court recommended that by then a forum like this was constituted as a service tribunal, which was its servant. The Northern Territory, as was the Appellant, may request the jurisdiction of the courts, the common jurisdiction established for the decision of a civil dispute where a service registration advocate from Garh Maharaja lawyer