GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus MALIK ABDUR RASHID
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 96 and 115 Required Filing of Appeal Limit 7 198 10 Appealed for a certified copy of the trial court's decision and order, which was prepared Was made and ready for delivery on 26 11 1987, but the applicant received his delivery on 17 12 1987, under which the Court of Appeal received the Appeal Fund filed on 19 12 1987 because after time restriction. The time required to obtain a copy of the decision and to submit the order began with the date of the submission. The party's negligence in obtaining such copy transmitted to his party at the end of the day when it was prepared and ready for delivery cannot be counted as required under the law record. At the time it was not shown that the applicant had been misled. High Court dismisses application for review of circumstances by any copy agency agency
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer
