Find a Lawyer

MURTAZA versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / evidence 34) Testimonies of Evidence Eye witnesses made consistent statements that were supported by medical evidence. The victim was a co-accused and his partner in the case was a co-accused. The brother of the main accused had to perform straightforward motions to eliminate the deceased. Could not have killed the person who had kept the victim in his grip at the time of the incident. The conviction and sentence of both the accused were retained. The orgy account cannot be denied because of the two brothers mentioned above, which resulted in the safe administration of justice as a result of the accused and Take advantage of the doubt as a rule of caution how to become a advocate from Lodhran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes