In order to meet the requirements of Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O VI, R 17 Talbs, the performance talks have to mention the date, time and place and the name of the informant which was not mentioned in the current. The statements of the two witnesses were recorded in the case, but the informant's statement was not recorded to prove that he had informed the plaintiff on a particular date, time and place. There was a decrease in the history of the performance of Ishid. In their claims, which were to be made as soon as possible after the dialogue was sought, the appellate court dismissed the petitioner's appeal more than 14 days later, in which there was no instability, legal or factual, for good and strong reasons. Was not identified. High Court interference judgment and decree reversed using amending jurisdiction
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
