Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus THE STATE

Articles 302/34 and 324/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 1602 Law Marriage (10 of 1984), Arts 140 and 151 (3) Appreciating the evidence allow the accused to face the witness with his prior statement Neither giving nor contradicting the record is an irrational hearing in a trial whose testimony is guaranteed by the trial court's denial of its sentence or any part thereof. This is not allowed to cope with a cross-statement with a previous statement of. In such a situation the witnesses had the right to guide the evidence in relation to the existence of the previous statement by reading the entire statement and by presenting or presenting the police officer or the police officer as a witness. The defense of the prosecution's testimony contradicts its previous statement, which was admitted on record when the witness refused to make a statement before the police trial. The court did so by committing an unlawful act. Was untreatable The defense had the right to take advantage of any material contradiction in the statements of the prosecution witnesses His trial could not be heard by the trial court. In such circumstances the order was made, but the course was avoided as further examination of the record decided the appeal on the merit, it was possible that the witnesses were witnesses of the occasion and that they were guilty at the time of the ocular account of the incident. Were not present on the occasion. The physical evidence was denied eventually the prosecutor's version was brought on the record and it was alleged that the complainant had been summoned from his village and after being disrespected substantially. tax advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer