Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (RTD.) MUHAMMAD SULEMAN KHAN versus D.C./REGISTRAR, LAHORE DISTRICT

Stamp Act 1899 Section 27 A Notice Memo No. HRC / 20277, Dated 20 10 1992 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Sale of Compliance with Stamp Duty Compensation Rules, as prescribed by the amended rates. The refusal to register the deed was submitted to the sub-registrar for registration and the value of the property was kept at a rate which the sub-registrar of the court raised objection to the determination of the value of the property and instructed the applicants. That they charge at this price according to the rates set by the collector. Memo number HRC / 20277, dated 20 10 1992 was not legally notified of value and was not published in the official Gazette, therefore, it had no legal effect as notification was only legal effect. I could have taken it if it was published regularly, the official gazette where the notification in the official gazette had not been published cannot be accepted under section 27A of the Stamp Act. 1899 The Sub-Registrar was unable to disobey the court's decree or to comply with its terms and could not instruct the party to pay the extra stamp duty on the prices themselves, calculated by the limits and the forecasts thereof. Such demand was illegal, had no legal effect and the High Court directed the sub-registrar to file the sale process after full consideration as decided by the court as to the amount of property sold. Was granted, in these circumstances the application was granted jobs for fresh advocates from Kalaswala lawyer