Find a Lawyer

SHAFQAT ISHAQ ALIAS SHAUKAT versus THE STATE

The testimony of the 302/34 and 392/34 evidence of the clauses was completely independent and the witnesses could not be treated with opportunity witnesses at a short distance from the residence. Syed witnesses disclosed the details of the accused to the FIR informant. The witnesses made false statements against the accused in the identity parade in jail and in the court stationing, there was no evidence of any injuries sustained by the accused at the hands of the accused. The person, but there is a slight distance between the place where the firearm is maintained: the injury to the person killed by the motorcycle and the place where the accused motorcycle was found in his possession and the short time between the two incidents. Distant, it was strong conditions that the accused fired at the deceased, took away his motorcycle and fell on the road with a running motorcycle. The evidence on record and its circumstances connected the suspect to the crime commission substantially, and the accused's conviction is maintained in the circumstances that a frog's death sentence is up to life imprisonment. , There is no difference in the individual role o In this case two accused online advocate from Chawinda lawyer