MEHMOOD HASSAN versus THE STATE
Sections 302/324 / 337A (ii) / 337F (ii) / 34, 309 and 310 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 345 (2) were compromised during the possibility of appeal at the time of the agreement between the parties. The conviction and sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court offense against the accused was extended by the legal heirs of the victim without any hardship or influence, and even the injured juveniles were sentenced in court. The guardians were waived their right to record their statements by the minors who were injured in the event that he had the impression that he (used in the name of Allah) apologized. And that they did not mind if the accused were acquitted of the charges then the natural guardians of the minors, who were their father and mother, were fully capable of promoting the crime on behalf of the minors, a compromise between the parties. Permission was granted and the accused was acquitted of the charges accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tobatek Singh lawyer