Find a Lawyer

IFFAT RAZI versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3, Explanant I1 Anti Terrorism Act (XXV of 1997), Section 11 of a Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 9 and 10 Constitutional petition Freedom of citizen protection, guaranteed The allegation of the constitution against Divya Haqi Ditto was that he was a serpent ally or a member of a banned organization involved in some abusive activities that prejudiced the interest and protection of the public, No content was created. Danteo was a member of a banned organization or a member of a banned organization within seven days of my declaration being banned, saying that Detino was not enough to be a member of such an organization, but to prevent one's freedom and liberty. Was for To do the same in the detention order, the individual order had to be placed in a concentration order that did not contain the appropriate content. The detention of any person on the report of any investigating agency, in which they are prevented of any material in which they declare the interests of the management of the discipline as discriminatory and in violation of Section 3, West Pakistan. The Maintenance of Public Order was valid without the Ordinance, 1960's Explan II. The authority and jurisdiction, Ditto, had been ordered by the High Court to release him soon if he did not need the principles in any other case. property advocates from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer