Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, MULTAN

The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), 1993, in its petition were directed by the granting of the accused in the grant of pardon: against the authorities from time to time, including the pardon after his arrest. Be released and released. If he had already completed his sentence, then the purpose of the incident was that some time ago there was a dispute between the complainant and his accused's daughter-in-law, but the settlement was, in the event, limited. The person was allegedly armed with a pistol 30 bore on the petitioner / accused of personal enmity while his co-accused was also equipped with firearms and the incident occurred at night and the accused was identified by light or light bulb. There was imprisonment between the two sides. At night, people could not feel fear and insecurity. En It has nothing to do with the purpose for which the alleged crime was committed. Sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Special Courts) Act , The trial by a special court established under 1975, will not be sufficient to deprive the accused of the amnesty obtained by the competent authorities. The accused were instructed to make a pardon pakistani advocates Umer Kot lawyer