Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

Article 212 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 The dismissal of the employee was found to result in an inquiry into the corruption of a civil servant, he was dismissed from the job and ordered to recover a certain amount of money against the government employee. Was later approved. After treatment, an appeal was filed before the service tribunal, which was accepted and up to 3 years for the offense of preventing the employee from increasing the employment by amending the dismissal sentence while retaining a certain amount of money from the civil servant. Was modified in the The Tribunal accepted the advanced appeal of the public servant, with the observation that the case was the first instance of corruption by a public servant and that the Supreme Court, verifying the appeal for less than Rs 2 lakh involved, had examined the argument. In addition, the mere fact that this was the first instance of corruption e-government employee, in his job, had no justification in paying a minor penalty and was sued by a government employee for service tribunal. This appeal was banned and no request for condolences was delayed. Was best law firms from Bhirya Road lawyer