MUHAMMAD ALTAF versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 148 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) required that the testimony of a police officer was not considered as guilty of the four accused. In its proper context because the benefit to the accused was not extended. That the magistrate's order to release the accused was not taken into account and was set aside without giving the accused the opportunity to hear or record some evidence. That the testimony of the witnesses was not found to be reliable in respect of the two acquitted accused, and in the absence of reliable and reliable supporting evidence, such evidence of conviction cannot be grounded. That the eyewitnesses who gave the ocular account are interested and without the independent co-operation of their evidence could not be the basis for the finding of the guilty, and that the apparent contradiction in the medical and ocular evidence could not be made without a valid reason. Was deleted The court allowed the accused to consider the shortcomings
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Tando Adam lawyer