AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN versus IKRAMULLAH KHAN
Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 4 (a) (ii) and (b) (ii) Federal Treasury Rules, Volume 1, R576 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) mandatory retirement civil servant was retired from employment on a charge of disqualification because he was a divisional accounts officer, issuing checks without the approval of the Czech Drawing Authority Service Tribunal and Failed to detect and identify anomalies in the drawing. The government employee adjusted the inquiry officer's fines to a halt to his progress for 3 years, stating that several officials had failed to fulfill their responsibilities effectively, while the chief responsibility was the district accounts officer and his staff. Was imposed, but no civil action was taken against any other person, except during the employment of a public servant of the public servant, who was the first in charge of performance, for which he was not primarily responsible for the punishment. Always be on offense. It turned out that the case was not fraudulent, fraudulent or fraudulent, but on the contrary, it was incompetent and it was likely that the lower class was born. Certainly the error of the offense imposed on public servants and certainly not for any purpose was indeed excessive, which was rightly denied by the tribunal's Supreme Court and the application was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer