HAQ NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (c) and 449 evidence ???? The role of the accused in the commission of the murder of the victim was proved by the witnesses who could not replace the original accused. Were. Ocular testimony could not be ruled out because of the witnesses' relationship with the victim, whose medical evidence proved to be the motive for the incident, and evidence of the recovery against the accused was also corroborated by Franzek's report. The science laboratory convicted and the conviction of the accused was maintained under Section 22 ((c), PPC) while the complaint did not occur inside the nephew of the complainant, the accused was charged under Section 9449, PPC. Was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Neelam lawyer
