Find a Lawyer

MST. ALLAH RAKHI versus N/SUB. (RETD.) MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Limitations Act 1908 Article 144 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Advantage of the Suit Declaration and Permanent Order of Defamation Claimants based on the entries in the record Has claimed ownership of his property since 1939, in favor of his predecessor as his tenant without paying any rent to the other owners, and has instead owned the negative property for more than 12 years. Claimed ownership due to the title of their predecessor. The trial court dismissed the case and the petitioners / appeals court also dismissed the appeal. Applicant's record number of applicants was recorded in the applicant's calendar number 4 between 1939 40 and 1964 65, and during this period, he had a partner as long as he was a partner. That he sold his share, and to the extent of the other shareholder's share, that he had been cultivating the suit land in column number 8 of the rack as his tenant entry. The rights order merely indicated that he was not paying the rent because he was also the co-owner, but he did not establish his ownership of the entire suit estate in order to exclude the other shareholders, if the speculative ownership column I was in favor of the entries, and if the predecessor had been the owner of the suit land since 1939, then such right is mentioned in an independent order or proceeding and in the ownership column as well. Without the payment of rent, the applicant / predecessor is neither a partner nor does the tenant have a period against their co-sharers or landlords or landowners. Understand negative ownership advocate for immigration from Kohistan lawyer