Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE

Sections 230 / / & / and 2 392/34 ???? The evidence was not defined by the medical evidence confirming the ocular account which stated in the FIR that one of the accused was pressing the neck of the accused and the other accused on the victim. Can't exclude the possibility that a firing was occurring. The presence of eyewitnesses at the time of the incident was suspicious of the co-accused who were injured in the shooting, and their behavior was unusual at that time, which was recorded after deliberation and consultation after receiving the post-mortem report. Was. The crime, vacated by chance, was allegedly under the influence of two-section PS by the investigating officer, who was the real brother of the victim and said that the inquiry report was recovered which was also a violation of this provision. Section 103CCPC Defense had set up tents in the prosecution case, the benefit of which had to go to the accused under the law. Skepticism, in the circumstances patent advocate from Faisalabad lawyer