ROSHAN ALI versus AMIR BUX
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Sections 153B, 166, 499, 500, 504 and 506 Termination of proceedings against the applicant / accused charged by the complainant. The request for the complaint was that the complainant who attended the school was a minor child. According to the government policy, the rally was implemented under the order of the applicant / accused, who was serving as the District Education Officer at the relevant time. The notice was submitted to the applicant by the complainant to whom the applicant replied that further allegation was that the complainant was in the town. Enjoying good reputation, dignity, the applicant was notorious by some of the comments made by the applicant in response to the applicant's legal notice; there was no allegation in the complaint against the applicant. That it encouraged the students to engage in any kind of political activity that was caused by the complainant and there was no criminal threat from the applicant as per the trial magistrate's provisions of the PPC. Which was admitted by the complainant in his complaint without determining the applicability of the said provisions Was added. The notice that can be taken under Sections 499 and 500, PPC and any offense under Section 504 and 506, PPC, was not contemptuous, threatening or abusive, misusing the other provisions. Was prosecuted, prosecuted, malicious and illegal by magistrates and by exercising powers, proceedings against the applicants / accused were canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer