Find a Lawyer

AIJAZ MUSTAFA SAMTIO, ADVOCATE versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 Orders 2 (e) and 5 (1) The appointments for the positions of the Civil Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Section 5 Civil Judges and Judicial Magistrates were to be made by preliminary appointment on the recommendation of the Provincial Election. ? The Board provided under R5 (1) of the Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994 Rule 2 (e) of the above rules provided that the Provincial Selection Board shall be the Executive Committee of the High Court or a committee which shall be held by less than three High Court Judges. The requirements of the special court judges regarding the appointment of full judges were not made on the recommendation of the specially constituted board, but on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of the High Court without considering the third outcome. Was. The written test taken by the Authority in connection with the appointments, not in accordance with the rules, was not a notification on the appointment of violations of the rules, however, as the civil judges have been appointed, on ad hoc basis. Shall be considered as appointed and will continue in that capacity until a new election is made in accordance with the rules. female advocates from Phalia lawyer