AMIR ALI versus THE STATE
The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324 evidence, a reduction in the incident was a day-to-day event which was supported by eyewitnesses, the statements of the injured witnesses further corroborated the statements of the witnesses or their false. No chance of an impression. Prosecutor was present There was no prior hostility to the accused from making false accusations to the prosecution witnesses. He had successfully proven his case. There was a reason for the trial court to intervene in the indictment, but in view of the complainant's conduct, the accused could be sentenced to life imprisonment who did not attempt to arrest the accused. The location of the hearing and the location of the victim's weeping, the th e investigation were carried out and the medical examination of the witnesses who were injured prior to the registration of the PIR were the circumstances in which it is considered that the case fit. Where the death sentence should be punished with life imprisonment, accordingly the sentence was reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Dhatmal lawyer