SHAHID IQBAL versus RIAZ AHMAD
There was a record of cancellation of sections 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 109, 148 and 149 of pre-arrest bail, to which the accused was apprehended for complicating the crime. , Who testified to the injured prosecution. It is stated that the accused opened fire with his 8mm rifle and consequently suffered injuries to his left hand and the prosecution's trial warrant for alleged or explicit dispute between oral and medical evidence. The stage will not be suspicious. This case was supported not only by the complainant's statement, but also by the statement of the prosecutor's witness, who was also injured during the incident in which unclaimed material was available in which the Primary Fel. The crime was linked to the commission, the accused was a member. The unlawful assembly and its contents were put forward and no proper ground was available to allow the accused to bail before arrest. The Tang pre-arrest bail was approved by the court against the principles presented by the High Courts for clear discretion and advance bail, the High Court upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Khanqah Sharif lawyer