ARSHAD ALI versus THE STATE
Section 497 Survivor of the Eliaset Arms Act (XXI of 1991), Sections 4 and 7 bail, the grant of the charges against the accused was that he was found in possession of 30 bore pistols and two live bullets. Did not have a license It can be said that if anyone had unlicensed weapons and did not surrender them within the stipulated time through a notification issued by the federal government, the person on the weapon would be charged under the Surrender of What is the crime The prosecution could not place the required notification on record, the FIR did not specify that the accused was an illegal weapon before the date of any target and that he had allegedly surrendered to the alleged arms surrender before the illegal arms act. Did not Cannot be used to arrest anyone in 1991 on charges of possession of a firearm without a proper license. Such an act was not a punishable offense under the aforesaid Act, but there was reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was not guilty of the crime on which he was charged under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. He was ordered to be released on bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer