ABDUL RAZZAQ ABID versus SPECIAL JUDGE (CENTRAL), F.I.A., LAHORE
Arts 132 and 133 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 439 of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII 1979), section 17/22/24 dismissed by a further cross-examination indictment hearing for a cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses. The court, the accused challenged in reviewing the dismissal order before the High Court prosecution witness who was examined in court, was examined by the accused's lawyer and then participated. It was investigated by the accused's lawyer. The trial court charged the witness with further investigation, in which case, the defendant's request for further examination of the witness was rightly dismissed, any unlawful interference in the trial case or In the absence, it cannot be interrupted to modify.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Ziarat lawyer