Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code section 302/392/34/109 validated the evidence was merely a confessional statement against an accused, which he allegedly gave to a prosecution witness, the defendant's statement was the effect of his The co-accused was involved in the murder commission, but he only provided them with the weapons of the crime and said that the weapon was not used in the commission of the crime because the report by the Franz Science Laboratory was negative and thus the recovery of these people. The weapons obtained from the possession of the co-accused were in connection with the confessional statement of the accused, the statement of the prosecutor's testimony was disputed, with no other independent particulars. That was not confirmed by the prosecution, when he failed to connect the accused to the crime, he was acquitted of the charge, the alleged confessional statement of the joint of the other two co-accused, It had no identifiable value and was excluded The evidence remaining against the defendants was the retrieval of the weapon; the crime was that the pistol was not pursued from the seized positions on the occasion and by the co-accused. Revolver was recovered. Such recovery was unusual and the associate was not linked to the murder commission. The accused were acquitted. Accused of murder, but the prosecution successfully set up a robbery case against him under Section 392/34, PPC, as witnesses in full prosecution of the articles recovered from them were arrested under Section 392/34. , Indicating the conviction and sentencing of the accused under PPC. , Was retained law websites from Bunner lawyer