Find a Lawyer

ILTAF HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

None of the accused in sections 302, 392 and 34 of the clauses were named in the complaint, but their characteristics are stated and they were arrested on the basis of the said characteristics, only for the accused's involvement. Evidence submitted by the court was restored on the evidence of the recovery of arms as well as the proof of receipt of the currency notes and proof of identification tests fell on the ground as the Investigation Officer himself filed the Investigation Officer's testimony. As well as recording his statement, the evidence for the recovery of the arms of the crime was also lost. It was of no use because the weapons were not recovered as soon as the weapons were recovered, the evidence of the accused's identity did not work for the prosecution as no witnesses had disclosed the role of each of the accused. He identified evidence of the parade identified by the accused, in which case there was no record of how the police discovered the incident at odd hours of the night when according to the complainant notified the police Was not sent when Section H's presence at the scene was shrouded in mystery and identity. The suspect was suspected that the prosecution failed to reach the accused's home beyond reasonable doubt, the accused were sentenced and sentenced, and they were acquitted of the charges and were ordered to be released soon. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dadakhel lawyer