MUHAMMAD UMAR versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (1), Third Proviso Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/353/147/149 Guaranteed defendant was behind bars for more than 4/2 years. And for more than two years since then the declaration has not been published in connection with the fugitive co-accused because of lack of funds, the accused under the law cannot be deprived of the freedom of law without due process. Such freedom cannot be stopped by mistake. Prosecutors and the state allege that the accused were involved in the attack on the police party, IPSO would not, in fact, prove their guilt or delay them without prosecuting them as hard and frustrated criminals. And they can't. The prosecutor wants to be the victim of cheap and slow behavior
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Kotla lawyer