THE STATE versus MIAN MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF
Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Section 25 (4) Appeal against evil-retention lawyer The Advocate General has to file appeals against the offender by compulsory notification and letters and punish the accused in accordance with the provisions of section 25 (4). Was authorized and directed to increase. ) Legal action or enforcement of any judicial matter involved under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which is the power to file the appeals required by the power or the person acting on behalf of the Advocate General. Had the authority to do. It will advise, or lead to speculation that he has been legally authorized and instructs to do so, a letter issued by the provincial government; addressing the Advocate General to appeal against the invalid decision. The approval required to be given priority was brought on record in accordance with the legal procedure under which it was alleged that it was not beyond any reasonable doubt as required by Section 25 (4) of the Counter-Terrorism Act. We could. In the Act, 1997, the requests were not complied with in which the appeals were requested to be dismissed within the limits, which were excluded under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Sikandarabad lawyer