The Section 9 (C) Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), the identification of section 11 drug paraphernalia and the alleged trafficking of trafficking, forced the police to hold a checkpoint and, following arrest, seized its own petrol tank In the presence of 13 2kg of hashish, the trial court convicted and sentenced the accused under Section 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic. Accuracy of the Material Stances Act, 1997 All witnesses were permanently discharged that the accused, including his own vehicle, was arrested on the spot, which was under his supervision because he was driving at the same time because of any witnesses. There is no contradiction in the statement that it was related to cross-examination. The suspect was aware of hiding drugs in his vehicle's petrol tank because when he was prompted to try and stop the arrest, the suspect himself revealed the presence of the drug in the vehicle, the suspect was in special control of the vehicle. In which the drug was kept in a secret cave, therefore, it will be understood that the record in the special possession of marijuana recovered from the vehicle did not indicate on the record that the accused was drugged or falsely accused. Samples taken from the recovered substance were sent to the forensic science laboratory, which found that their names were found at the time of the charge. Existed. It was alleged that he was approximately 17/18 years of age in Section 11 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, that the court was given discretion to decide on the issue of the release of the inferior children in the trial. Failure to exercise such discretion or to exercise such discretion would constitute a guilty verdict. In the present case, the trial
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
