IBRAHIM versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (CONS.), SARGODHA DIVISION, SARGODHA
Land Settlement Act 1958 Section 10 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII Of 1967), Sections 161, 163 & 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Implementation of Allotment Order by Land Allotment Revenue Authorities The allotment of land in the dispute was endorsed by the Image Authority in favor of the Allies, and this endorsement is up to the Supreme Court allotment, which was eventually settled by the Supreme Court, Revenue Authorities Supreme. The court is bound to make a decision, implement the same process by registering in the revenue record, but The numerical reversal was rejected by the Revenue Authority in view of the respondents' claims in respect of the land, yet the defendant failed to show any order of allotment in their favor which was final. For all intents and purposes, however, it had a binding effect and could not harm its utility b In the case of the implementation of the Supreme Court decision regarding the disappearance of the appellate authority by the High Court. Was declared illegal by the High Court on the issue of revenue authorities. Exercising its constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Jehanian lawyer