Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code section 302 (b) and 324 testimonies of conviction, lack of accused confessed to the incident in its statement under section 342; CRPC refused to act on the defense version of its defense And no evidence was supported. The incident was not introduced during the investigation. On the contrary, the legal action was taken by the victim's wife, who was a natural witness and there was no challenge. There was no reason to make a false statement against the deceased's wife and she was a true witness. There was a witness whose testimony was also proved by the statement of the accused under Section 302 (b), that the PPC was retained for the reason that the accused was shot dead. Was made And he did not repeat the fire, even though he had the opportunity to do so. Repetition between the parties, which lacked presentation, was a reasonable basis for preventing the extreme death sentence that the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. However, the accused did not cause any harm to the complainant nor was he punished during the incident. He was found guilty of any firing and a sudden case of that incident; he was acquitted of the charge under Section 324, PPC. lawer from fb area from Killa Abdullah lawyer