Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/364/34/337 E (ii) Definition of evidence, reduction of death penalty cases and the accused was immediately named in the FIR, mine or the victim of the prosecution witnesses Had no relationship with There is a basis for rejecting his testimony because he had no previous hostility to the false allegations or alternatives except for the real culprits, the medical evidence and blood-stained evidence of the ocular account presented by the prosecutor's witnesses. The recovery of the dagger was fully confirmed. The accused prosecution successfully set up a case against the accused, the trial court could not interfere with the sentence against the accused. At the time of commission of the crime, the accused was under 18 years of age. Was acquitted. Denying the same evidence, it was alleged that he had suffered only one injury to the deceased and although he did not repeat it, the victim was at the mercy of the accused, whom the accused belonged to. Which showed that the deceased must have arrived at the scene, while he was armed with a pistol and the prosecutor's story as described by the complainant was not gospel. In fact, the priority of the accused could not have been proved during the trial against the accused. In the absence of the death sentence, he was also reduced to life imprisonment which could have served the purpose of justice. when you need a advocate from Pishin lawyer