MST. BACHHO versus ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN ALIAS HABIB ULLAH
A. XLI, R 31 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Decision on Appeal for Section 42 Trial The appeal was bound by state court's reasons for discouragement and the reasons for the state's decisions, which were stated The court was required to deal with every aspect of the matter while the appeal hearing forced the entire court to reopen the dispute. While discussing the evidence recorded by the trial court and threadbare for its confirmation, the appellate court decided to appeal without limiting the record of the final case, the appellate court is legally obliged to comply with OXLI, R. 31, decide the dispute in the default manner under CPC. Which was a compulsory provision of the law, otherwise the judgment would not be in accordance with the law. The appellate court had to render all the verdict in the end. The appellate court's decision on the matter should include points for resolving disputes and the reasons for the decision. Those who were lacking in the matters decided were set aside and the trial court was kept on remand so that further decisions could be made on the merit as per the law. ?
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
