Sections 13 and 28 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R 34 Case Notice for Student Evidence Evidence The courts ruled that the defendants could not refuse the burden to prove that the defendant had a daily routine. I was registering a sale. Do not show the receipt of the person by the plaintiff and such registration was violated in the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, R 34 of 1968, such registration did not assert the right; Could not be disabled for display. , He had to be deposed as a caretaker of the law, without commenting under the provisions of the 1984 Act, without evidence, even otherwise, the admission by a witness against the truth would not be binding on the party and There was no final effect of such admission which resulted in the issuance of the fee for issuance of the registration fee, but this register was not presented in support of the relevant daily respondents with the patwari, so that it appeared. As the plaintiff already knows the sale o f the courts were retained The amendments were rejected
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
