Sections 452, 354, 34, 337 F (i) and 337 F (iii) Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Articles 403, 417 and 249 A General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 13 Double Appeal against the endangerment, protection against the Scope police report case and the magistrate of the private complaint case, on this single basis, charged the accused under Section 249A, CCPC with acquittal from the police report case and so on. The accused cannot be an accused. The same offense was tried twice for legal protection against double jeopardy and the crime could not be heard. If the accused had been acquitted in the complaint case, the magistrate would have been justified in acquiring the accused in the police report case since the risk of double jeopardy was not decided in either of the cases, and both were the same. I am under trial, so the magistrate was legally bound to stop him. The e-police reported the case and heard the case. The so-called ruling of the trial magistrate upheld the principle of double jeopardy and violated the provisions of the law as well as allowed the appeal of the constitution against evil, the unclean order of the magistrate was dismissed and the case dismissed. Was. The police report received the remand of the trial court with the instruction to stop the case and to forward the private complaint case and to decide according to the law.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
