Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD.


In reference to the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 136 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1981, rr 11 and 15, the High Court Appellate Tribunal did not comply with the valid rules of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1991. In the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981, a memorandum of appeal has been arranged under the memorandum where it was not filed in the specified manner. Sub-clause (3) of R-15 also deals with the situation where an appellant has lived. Provided an opportunity to resolve the deficiency and remedy the deficiency, either failing to represent at the time set forth in sub-rule (1) or failing to comply with the provisions of this subsection rule, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Was not justified in rejecting the Department's appeal without dismissing the opportunity to meet this shortage if the appeals filed in the present case are considered to be heard before the Tribunal and resolved accordingly. Law

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Gujrat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.