SALEEM IQBAL, ADVOCATE, DISTRICT COURTS, MIANWALI versus PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL
Sections 41, 42 (2) and 43 (5) of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973 (Article 53), Article 199 Constitution of the suspension of the legal practitioner's license against the Constitutional Lawyer Counsel Council is the scope of the Bar Council Petitioner's Disciplinary Committee. The option was a process. A lawyer and application was filed before the Bar Council's Dispensary Committee, alleging that his professional degree was a fake and fraudulent committee. Accepting the petition: The applicant's license was suspended under section 42 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973, which was the only tribunal that could impose a penalty and that too after the completion of the inquiry. A legal dispensary committee could only entertain and inquire into the complaint and where the complaint was not dismissed, the same matter could be referred to a tribunal pending investigation. The complaint, even the Dispensary Committee had no power to suspend. The Dispensary Committee had nothing to do with the complaints against the Advocate, which had no legal authority and no legal authority to order a license suspended by the Dispensary Committee. The remand for judgment was obtained pursuant to this law that the constitutional application was granted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
