Find a Lawyer

BNA versus MUHAMMAD AZAM, JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, LAHORE

The reversal of Articles 11 (3) and 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, the family court stopped respondents' cross-inspection right and thereafter filed the respondent. The order was withdrawn on request. Such right of the parties was protected under Section 11 (3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The right to have a valuable right to cross examination could not be taken lightly, nor is there any clear provision for any party to close that right. In view of the trial, re-examination or re-examination of a witness, or the justice and justice of a speedy judgment, the Family Court had the inherent authority to pass such order and to return such order if the Family Court decided. If the parties failed to reach a compromise or agreement where the right to a fast court was terminated, the family court overruled the provisions of section 12 of the West by ruling on the Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The order denying it was illegal and according to the constitutional jurisdiction the Family Court High Court reversed the Family Court High Court. Ambe refused to interfere with the order passed by the Family Court Petition. jobs for fresh advocates from Nowshero Feroz lawyer