Section 7ven7 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (2000 XX of XXII), Section 11 (a) Valuation of unnatural crime (sodomy) evidence In a mosque trial court, its victim pleaded guilty under Section 3377, PPC And sentenced him to seven years. The complaint of the complainant (victim) was delayed by four hours in filing the RI accuracy report, which stated in his report that upon arrival, his house reported the incident to his mother, which resulted in her He informed his uncle, therefore, that delaying the filing of the FIR was not unusual in that the victim, who was about a 7- to 8-year-old boy, could make a false case for involvement. The accused or he could substitute the accused for someone else, was not credible. Victim had not charged any wrongdoing, malice or misconduct against the accused. The complainant (the victim) was charged for the commission of unnatural crime, which was further corroborated by medical evidence. The doctor was bleeding from the victim's anus and confirmed that the doctor also testified that the accused was successful in performing sexual acts. Although under Section 11 (a) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the court had the discretion to release a minor from a trial, but in the present case, the accused juvenile had committed fornication in a mosque, which is abusive, abusive, Was brutal and brutal and the release of the accused. Upon scrutiny, the public will get the impression that there is no law to prevent people from committing such crimes and that the punishment of the offenders has been maintained under Section 7777, however, the directive is sent to the PPC. As well as 5,000 on it
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
