Section 4/34/34 / 777F (iii) Efforts to commit the General Conviction of the Inquiry, Shared Intentions and Appreciation of the Evidence of Knowledge Causing any Person to Suspect Benefit of the Suspect's Eyewitness, The Complainant's Father Was not presented before. The court was supportive of this version, but was dismissed because of the unnecessary seed act of restraining most natural and material witnesses, which would create the impression that, if the said witness was presented, he might have Prosecution will not be supported. In his first report, the incident was witnessed by many people there, but the four witnesses presented by the investigating officer during the investigation were dropped by the undercover vehicle's prosecution driver, who was the most natural and material of the incident. The witness was not present, either said that the witnesses were not supporting the prosecution's case or that they were prevented from cross-examining and bringing the facts to reality. The prosecutor's case was materially affected by the non-examination of key witnesses. The complainant did not disclose the nature of the weapons in his first report, which the defendants carried at the time of the incident. Could not delete the description of the weapon present. The accused, when the relevant distance between the complaining party and the accused was only ten speed, and on the occasion the report was filed, the suspect's first report raised suspicion in connection with the prosecution in the hands of the accused. ? The complainant's behavior was very dubious, as no one went to the police station to file a report, the medico legal report would indicate
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
