MITHAN versus JAMILA
CCC Recipients' CCC Rules Order XL O XL, RI and O XXXIV, R 1 No specific instance of the case was presented for release of the recipient or in the request for appointment of the recipient It was not disclosed that the suit was property. Plaintiff's appropriate convenience should not be a factor in the recipient's appointment, but the risk or risk of property loss should be established, not sufficient for the plaintiff / applicant to disclose the first case, but it must It has been shown that the property in the hands of the opposing party is in danger of being lost or that there is a risk of loss of property along with irreparable loss or injury since the appointment of the recipient interrupts the possession of the person. And one of them is considered to be the most severe treatment, even in extreme cases
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jamshoro lawyer
