M. SALEEM AHMAD SIDDIQUI versus SABIRA BEGUM
Article 5 Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Maintenance Fixing Applicant Court, along with the Family Court of Respondents, withdrew from the legitimate means of the applicant for the rehabilitation of the wife and children, the monthly salary of the maintenance allowance simultaneously. More than that. It is not legally permissible for the applicant that the father was responsible for the care of his children and the previous care of his wife was also allowed in Islamic law, but the dominant factors that control the decision of such a question are not neglected. Can be made where no reasonable justification was made and not only the restitution amount was disputed but much more than the applicant's legal and disposable income, such an order could not be maintained, in the present case, both the courts , To assess the circumstances in determining the results of the restoration of the courts by quantum / rate I was mistaken. The restitution, therefore, could not be sustained by the restitution of justice, which resulted in the abuse of justice by the following courts, which led to the decisions of both the Family Court and the Appellate Court, and in the light of this case six children and their children The family court was remanded to review the amount of maternity care. As per the constitutional request, evidence was allowed on the record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer