Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

A delay of two days in filing an FIR in appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence spread a cloud of suspicion over the truth and accuracy of the prosecution's testimony, which claimed that the accused was in the company of the accused last. Once viewed, it will provide information to the complainant. , But he failed to do so and, with the accused, witnessing the victim, called the witness and neither spoke to him nor questioned him about his activities, which said that the witness was untrustworthy. The witness made up the case, and his testimony was nonexistent as the evidence was so unnatural, unthinkable and untrustworthy that the other witnesses of the prosecution were untrustworthy, their testimony cannot be believed that the murder was an unexpected one. The incident was, the prosecutor also failed to identify the location of the incident, failing to have the principal evidence, motions and medical evidence For this reason the prosecution could not prove the case, neither can the medical evidence prove the guilty prosecution's identity clearly failed to establish a case against the accused without any doubt, his sentence was terminated and if he In no other case did he need to be detained, and he was soon released from custody. property advocate from Chacklala lawyer