Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YAMEEN versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-1), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB


The constitutional request for approval of Articles 39 and 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 change of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, mutually disputed the applicants alleging that the sanction was contrary to the earlier order passed by the court. Was also given. Lawsuits did not create rights, no constitutional application can be maintained against it. If the court-approved orders were disobedient, the applicants also had other remedies available to them through the applicants. The earlier suit was dismissed and the matter is pending. Appeals which raised an additional reason for non-interference with the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Phalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.